<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Universe Loves It When We Ask For More</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kingsidharth.com/60/universe-loves-it-when-we-ask-for-more/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kingsidharth.com/60/universe-loves-it-when-we-ask-for-more</link>
	<description>The Leading Edge of Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 09:34:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Biarge</title>
		<link>http://www.kingsidharth.com/60/universe-loves-it-when-we-ask-for-more/comment-page-1#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Biarge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 18:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingsidharth.com/?p=60#comment-291</guid>
		<description>Sorry. I don&#039;t like disturb and I can move my position really.

I think you has my email, this is lbiar@mail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. I don&#8217;t like disturb and I can move my position really.</p>
<p>I think you has my email, this is <a href="mailto:lbiar@mail.com">lbiar@mail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: King Sidharth</title>
		<link>http://www.kingsidharth.com/60/universe-loves-it-when-we-ask-for-more/comment-page-1#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>King Sidharth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 17:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingsidharth.com/?p=60#comment-290</guid>
		<description>I wish you&#039;d have read what I wrote in the original article. Anyways. I&#039;ve seen your site and logic and would rather have this discussion in mails. In case you are open to listen.

Nothing good will come out if you&#039;ve decided to stand where you are and not move at all.

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish you&#8217;d have read what I wrote in the original article. Anyways. I&#8217;ve seen your site and logic and would rather have this discussion in mails. In case you are open to listen.</p>
<p>Nothing good will come out if you&#8217;ve decided to stand where you are and not move at all.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Biarge</title>
		<link>http://www.kingsidharth.com/60/universe-loves-it-when-we-ask-for-more/comment-page-1#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Biarge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 17:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingsidharth.com/?p=60#comment-289</guid>
		<description>&quot; You assume that space is contained in another ’space-time’ reality, keeping wich static we can measure speed of expansion and all.

It *might* not be so. For we have never been outside of our universe.&quot;

Theories speak over &quot;dark matter of Universe end&quot; (maybe I put this bad) or better of &quot;The cosmic background radiation&quot;

Then, how can receive that radiation?

There are theories that speak over that expansion by radius is at light speed or that expansion is a 1/t. Now I dont remember where I have read it, but I can give you a prove (it&#039;s in my web):

The light from this farthest  stars take out from stars according to Big Bang 13700 million ago, how it can’t be more quickly that speed light in this moment their distance from Universe center would be 379000 light-years, by that move away at 379000/13700000000 = 2,76e-5 respect to light speed. This is very near light speed and farther is the dark matter of Universe end

By that if the universe don&#039;t expand at light speed only can to be a difference from light speed maximum of 2,76e-5 (with reference at stars farthers nows) and without speak over &quot;The cosmic background radiation&quot; that is farther that the stars.

In my web (i recomend your reader) speak over all this problems with expansion.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; You assume that space is contained in another ’space-time’ reality, keeping wich static we can measure speed of expansion and all.</p>
<p>It *might* not be so. For we have never been outside of our universe.&#8221;</p>
<p>Theories speak over &#8220;dark matter of Universe end&#8221; (maybe I put this bad) or better of &#8220;The cosmic background radiation&#8221;</p>
<p>Then, how can receive that radiation?</p>
<p>There are theories that speak over that expansion by radius is at light speed or that expansion is a 1/t. Now I dont remember where I have read it, but I can give you a prove (it&#8217;s in my web):</p>
<p>The light from this farthest  stars take out from stars according to Big Bang 13700 million ago, how it can’t be more quickly that speed light in this moment their distance from Universe center would be 379000 light-years, by that move away at 379000/13700000000 = 2,76e-5 respect to light speed. This is very near light speed and farther is the dark matter of Universe end</p>
<p>By that if the universe don&#8217;t expand at light speed only can to be a difference from light speed maximum of 2,76e-5 (with reference at stars farthers nows) and without speak over &#8220;The cosmic background radiation&#8221; that is farther that the stars.</p>
<p>In my web (i recomend your reader) speak over all this problems with expansion.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: King Sidharth</title>
		<link>http://www.kingsidharth.com/60/universe-loves-it-when-we-ask-for-more/comment-page-1#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>King Sidharth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 16:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingsidharth.com/?p=60#comment-288</guid>
		<description>PS: Saw your website. No space for comments :&#039;(
On scientific note. You assume that space is contained in another &#039;space-time&#039; reality, keeping wich static we can measure speed of expansion and all. 

It *might* not be so. For we have never been outside of our universe. 

So answer is &quot;We don&#039;t know. so we assume.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS: Saw your website. No space for comments :&#8217;(<br />
On scientific note. You assume that space is contained in another &#8216;space-time&#8217; reality, keeping wich static we can measure speed of expansion and all. </p>
<p>It *might* not be so. For we have never been outside of our universe. </p>
<p>So answer is &#8220;We don&#8217;t know. so we assume.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: King Sidharth</title>
		<link>http://www.kingsidharth.com/60/universe-loves-it-when-we-ask-for-more/comment-page-1#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>King Sidharth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 16:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingsidharth.com/?p=60#comment-287</guid>
		<description>Luis,
So glad to hear from science minds. I am one of you.
The expansion of universe is not just &#039;physcial&#039; as &#039;Bing Bang&#039; theory might have it. (It&#039;s not even provable, is it?)

The asking in thoughts creates new thoughts and new ideas. That is what &#039;expansion&#039; is. Expansion of thought vibration. Expansion is of that which we have ever thought.

Expansion is more of &#039;non-physical&#039; than physical. Physical expansion has too many moving parts. 

You will know them better.

Nice to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luis,<br />
So glad to hear from science minds. I am one of you.<br />
The expansion of universe is not just &#8216;physcial&#8217; as &#8216;Bing Bang&#8217; theory might have it. (It&#8217;s not even provable, is it?)</p>
<p>The asking in thoughts creates new thoughts and new ideas. That is what &#8216;expansion&#8217; is. Expansion of thought vibration. Expansion is of that which we have ever thought.</p>
<p>Expansion is more of &#8216;non-physical&#8217; than physical. Physical expansion has too many moving parts. </p>
<p>You will know them better.</p>
<p>Nice to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Biarge</title>
		<link>http://www.kingsidharth.com/60/universe-loves-it-when-we-ask-for-more/comment-page-1#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Biarge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 16:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingsidharth.com/?p=60#comment-286</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m against Universe expansion and have a blog over it:

For example a question: The universe expand in any radius at light speed: How can accelerate? At what speed expand the diameter (radius x 2)?

This and more questions, doubts, proofs and hypothesis agains Universe expansion in http://bigbangno.wordpress.com

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m against Universe expansion and have a blog over it:</p>
<p>For example a question: The universe expand in any radius at light speed: How can accelerate? At what speed expand the diameter (radius x 2)?</p>
<p>This and more questions, doubts, proofs and hypothesis agains Universe expansion in <a href="http://bigbangno.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://bigbangno.wordpress.com</a></p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 101 High School Meditation &#38; Rocking Life Tips – Best of Best &#124; Meditation Rocks!</title>
		<link>http://www.kingsidharth.com/60/universe-loves-it-when-we-ask-for-more/comment-page-1#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>101 High School Meditation &#38; Rocking Life Tips – Best of Best &#124; Meditation Rocks!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 18:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingsidharth.com/?p=60#comment-74</guid>
		<description>[...] or borrow one at your own [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or borrow one at your own [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

